Drawing Now
In ‘Drawing Now’, much is made of the potency of drawing on the cusp of blindness. I aim to experiment by wearing a blindfold. I anticipate some interesting results. The book aims to present drawing as a traditional method; however, it is suggested that there should be a shift away from the practise of drawing figurative or landscape subjects. It proposes the idea that the actual process of drawing plays a part in framing the subject matter. This idea is described as ‘performative’. It champions the postmodernist obsessions with disillusionment, appropriation and precariousness. It seeks to call in to question of what is perhaps deemed to be artistic.
Drawing Now examines ideas that were exposed in the Bernice Rose exhibition, Allegories of Modernism, Contemporary Drawing (MOMA 1992). It focuses on the type of drawing that comes from contemplation as opposed to visual scrutiny. The books introduction hypothesises that renewed interest in drawing as an art form comes amidst comments via Arthur Dento. He states that in 1965 arts role had altered so significantly that it had reached a crossroads. He went on to say that if art were a story then perhaps, we are witnessing the end. A starker view is proposed by Jean Baudrillard who expresses the view that art can now only regurgitate what went before.
The introduction contests that drawing excludes itself from those arguments. If it is considered external to the mainstream of art history then it might be viewed in one or two lights. It might well be seen as an alternative method in which to practise within art that lay in crisis or a liberating force against the shackles of prevailing tendencies. The intro argues that because of the primitive nature of drawing it can express symbolism unhindered by technical constraints. It is therefore a perfect way in which to formulate visual concepts. It goes on to repeat Derrida’s assertion that blindness disrupts the belief that drawing can only interpret that which is physically visible. With this in mind we can now understand how drawing has the capacity to record thoughts.
Derrida alludes to the dichotomy between imitation and invention. Basically, the act of seeing is a means to a reference point, however, if we deprive ourselves of the sense of sight, we can still make a connection using drawing as a mechanism to record memory and thought. To conclude, ‘performative’ drawing equates to a predetermined idea transferred on to paper whilst constative drawing is mimetic in nature. Drawing produces a natural instinct to oscillate betwixt invention and imitation.
I am always reluctant to criticise other people’s work; however, I did find the text hard going. I managed to get the gist after several close reading sessions. There were many valid, informative and interesting points made in the intro, yet I felt overwhelmed by its excessively laboured and repetitious content. The author’s language is too sesquipedalian to fully capture my attention. I found myself having to refer to the dictionary all too often. Why use one word when a thousand complicated words will suffice?
Bibliography:
Emin, T., Downs, S., Marshall, R., Sawdon, P., Selby, A. & Tormey, J. 2011;2007;2008;, Drawing Now: Between the Lines of Contemporary Art, I.B.Tauris, GB.