Part three: Project 6: Modelling in plaster

Project 6: Modelling in plaster.

‘Oxidation 2’

     

So I rummaged through my very large box of polystyrene bits and pieces and found what I was looking for. I needed and discovered some sturdy pieces that I could fashion into something that might vaguely resemble my ‘Oxidation’ sculpture’ from Part 2. Project 3. I started out using my saw edged knife. I soon abandoned that knife in favour of long bladed craft knife. Too many loose bits flying everywhere. I stood the original on the work bench so I could study its form as I constructed the new version. Having cut all the required pieces to shape I then glued them into place. I cut about a dozen lengths of jute scrim in readiness. I mixed some some quality Crystacal R plaster in a flexi bucket and dipped half of the scrim into the creamy liquid plaster. I made the mistake of starting the plaster cladding directly on to the base board. I would need to separate the finished project from the board upon completion. I managed to achieve separation once the plaster had semi dried. This time I would place plastic sheeting between each surface.

     

    

    

The jute scrim is quite chunky and seems to have a mind of its own. I struggled at the start and cheated a little. I wanted to retain as much detail as possible and so I used some fine, ready impregnated jute, otherwise known as Mod-Roc. This was used sparingly. It was never going to be an exact copy of the original but I think I achieved a good likeness. I  have worked with plaster on many occasions but never in this way. It was a revelation. Taking a flexible material like polystyrene and transforming it into a robust, rigid entity gave me great satisfaction.

     

     

It’s not strictly an external piece. With the addition of a liquid polymer, this could be achieved. I thought long and hard about the finish. Should I go way out? perhaps fluorescent pink? leave it white or perhaps some spots as in Kusama’s work. I opted for a dirty clean metallic finish. This is how the original might have appeared before the rust formed on it surface. Using the trusty Zinsser 123 mixed with some grey pigment, I coated the sculpture using a cheap brush. This primer was good enough to use as a base. I grabbed an old rag, dipped it in some Modern Masters acrylic silver paint and began daubing the grey primed surface. I don’t think the photographs show off the finish particularly well and to my mind, the work looks better in the flesh.

    

     

     

‘Julie’ (2019)

       

      

I dug deep into my box of polystyrene scraps and pulled out a nice long piece. This would act as the base for ‘Julie’ in plaster. I cut the piece down to 70 cm’s. I stood back and looked at the oblong. I wondered just how I was going to achieve that same shape as the version in clay. Undaunted, I began to shape the polystyrene using my craft knife. The central hole was a bit tricky. The arms should have been wood but I thought I’d set myself a challenge and use polystyrene. This helped me to attain an organic look. I recently read of a sculptor who used welding gloves when working with clay. This helped him to achieve a more rustic finish. I had a few ideas about how I might achieve different textural finishes. I had considered using a comb. This would have been a relatively easy process. One would have to work quickly to produce a well groomed piece. Alternatively, why not throw caution to the wind and take your time. This way, the plaster starts to harden and you could attain a riotously rustic look. The grooves left by the comb would be advantageous. They would hold a background colour well and emphasise the fore. I had also considered encasing ‘Oxidation 2’ in tin foil. Another idea was to uniformly embed objects like small pebbles, broken coloured glass or seashells into the semi set plaster. I could have screeded over remaining gaps perhaps with pigmented plaster using a flexible spreader.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

I eventually elected to finish ‘Julie’ in faux aged, oxidised bronze. It just seemed to suit the Moore-like solidity of the piece. This must have been a subconscious decision based on my observed perception of much of his work. Had the piece been filligree in nature like say, that of Richier’s ‘The Bat’, then I might have considered a showy finish like silver or gold.

          

          

     

     

 

 

Thoughts on Matt Calderwood and Mike Nelson

Thoughts on Matt Calderwood and Mike Nelson

Mike Nelson ‘The Asset Stripper’ 2019

Following my own creative endeavour, ‘Oxidation’, I turn my attention to the work of Mike Nelson. I have been asked to comment on ‘The Asset Stripper’ (2019). The installation occupies the same arena as ‘Oxidation’. It is an expression of post industrialisation. The overall themes encompass physical work, redundancy and dilapidation. It appears to tell the story of an inexorable decline of British manufacturing. Is the work a tenuous reflection on Brexit? Nelson said he wanted to avoid dogma, preferring the work to generate debate on what gave rise to Brexit. I appreciate the sentiments behind this work and I would not question its artistic merits, however, I feel I would struggle to persuade a layman. Some of the ideas behind Nelson’s work echo that of mine but on a much grander scale. It represents the dying embers of our manufacturing industry. Nelson sees its demise as something to be lamented whereas I consider it worthy of celebration. I see the metal husks as a representation of the enslavement of the working classes. For me, the machines are the embodiment of a society accustomed to an economy based on want as opposed to need. Nelson aptly talks of 20th-century sculptures; they ‘started to look like machines and the machines started to look like sculptures.’ As a sculptural piece, the work now extends the life of the once seemingly redundant machinery.

"The Asset Strippers" by dick_pountain is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
“The Asset Strippers” by dick_pountain is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Matt Calderwood

It was amusing to read the anecdote about Calderwood’s ‘Some Things Just Work’ (2004). The broom and shovel sculpture is characteristic of much of Calderwood’s work. The balancing act came about after fooling around at his place of work. I like his idea about these objects never having to work again due to their celebrity status. His work tests the perceptions of volatility, tension and symmetry. Counterbalances are the key ingredients that make some of his sculptures work. If you were searching for a representational sculptural genre for Calderwood’s work, you might look under the heading ‘janitorial’. The work seems to employ an abundance of buckets, brooms, toilet paper and step ladders. He stretches the potential of these objects to their limits. The results are interesting and provocative.

Calderwood. M. (2004) ‘Some Things Just Work’

Bibliography:

Dawson. I. (2012) Making Contemporary Sculpture: Pages 1 71-177. Marlborough. The Crowood Press Ltd.

Judah. H. (2019) Fire Sale Britain: Mike Nelson [online] The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/mar/18/mike-nelson-interview-tate-britain-asset-strippers-cement-mixer [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Images:

Pountain. D. (n.d.) ‘The Asset Strippers’ [online image] Available at: https://search.creativecommons.org/photos/d7d53f84-b822-4daf-a579-a832c2ab5a03 [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Wilkinson. A. (2004) ‘Some Things Just Work’ . pietmondriaan.com [online image] Available at: http://pietmondriaan.com/2010/02/03/matt-calderwood/ [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Reflection on tutor feedback for assignment 2

Reflection on tutor feedback for assignment 2

Following an interesting and useful video tutorial, I feel more confident as I move forward. I had been apprehensive about my choice of materials and marrying those materials with ideas. I had become frustrated during part two. Was there such a thing as ‘sculptors block’?  The search for inspiration seemed to take up much valuable time but not wanting to cut corners, I persevered. Eventually, I had my light bulb moment with ‘Incandescent’. My tutor commented on the number of light bulbs I’d used in its construction. He suggested I stick to odd numbers when constructing repetitive or stacked module sculptures. I agree with his assertion that this is more aesthetically pleasing. Oddly, odd seems to work in the artistically visual sense. I will amend accordingly.

I have been encouraged by my tutor to consider the sensuality of my found items, e.g. pebbles from my cairn sculpture. He suggests using aspects of their form and colour that may in turn, assist in the development of my sketches. I am flattered by my tutors’ positive comments regarding my use and application of various faux finishes. I have taken on board, his advice not to rely too much on these finishes but rather examine the characteristics of the actual materials as in say, the light bulb sculpture ‘Incandescent’. As per my tutor’s suggestion, I need to express my opinions on the results of my efforts. I need to examine how I might improve my methods in order to achieve better outcomes. I will strive to transfer my ideas into the written word accordingly and with greater frequency.

In reference to my charcoal drawings, I found my tutors comments positive and reassuring. I agree with his observations regarding presence and quality of line. I feel comfortable using charcoal. It’s a little messy but gives pleasing results. A certain level of care needs to be exercised to avoid smudging. I have been informed by a neighbour about several spray-on products that work as permanent fixatives. I think it will be a worthwhile investment.

Part three: Project 5: Clay modelling

Number one: Having never attempted clay sculpting on this scale before, I was apprehensive about the outcome. For my initial sculpture I opted for the ‘maybe not’. My mind was quite empty and I just let my hands run riot. I knew I had to explore internal and external form so I needed to put  a hole somewhere and maybe a few indentations. Semi pleased with the result. On reflection, that bit on the top looks like some kind of handle. Perhaps a handle on a surreal teapot. A many spouted chocolate teapot straight out of  your worst nightmare. Never eat cheese just before bedtime.

   

   

   

Number two: My second attempt was a little more adventurous. This face gradually took on the form of a member of my table tennis club, a pinch of Winston Churchill and soupcon of Satan. I have no idea how or why these features materialised. Half way through I began to think of Churchill. He was staring back at me. I knew I had to destroy my efforts in order to make my next piece. I got my home made cheese wire and sliced the face. The face now became two halves. A split face, a split personality. Like my sculpture, there were two sides to Churchill. The celebrated heroic wartime leader on the one hand and someone with very dubious views on race, eugenics and women’s rights on the other. I thought I’d playfully slay the beast with my axe.

   

   

   

     

     

Number three: I really wasn’t sure where I was going with this one. I had an overwhelming desire to recreate some kind of ethnic artefact. It could be something that’s lain dormant in the crevices of my psyche. Part of me thinks it’s an oil lamp and a part of me thinks it’s a figure on a camel. It might be easier to decipher a Rorschach psychological inkblot test.

   

   

    

   

Number four: I think I’ll call her Julie. Extending upwards and outwards proved to be difficult when it came to her arms. I had to use wire to support the weight of the clay. The holes were just a means to fulfil the criteria of the exercise and have no specific meaning. One might argue that the larger hole  is symbolic of all heartless parents. Over five decades they have forced innocent children to watch ‘The Sound of Music’. I’m still speculating. These days I can take or leave Julie Andrews. I don’t know why my efforts seemed to have morphed into Julie. Perhaps I have subconsciously channelled my own tortured childhood memories on to the clay via my hands?

    

   

   

   

          

Number five: With an express desire to be bold, take risks and have fun, I elected to make a diving helmet besieged by an octopus. I took the clay from the last sculpture and reformed it into a sphere. I think I was influenced by a recent trip to my local Sealife Centre. Before I got started I thought I’d take a brief diversion into the world of Auguste Rodin. The main body of the piece was quite straight forward but the tentacles proved to be awkward. They fell off a couple of times. It was frustrating. I had to rework the clay and use wire to fix in place. I accept that this might not be an option if the work were to be fired in a kiln.

       

   

   

   

   

       

Bonus: For this piece, I wanted to create a geometric Celtic cross. This looked like it might easier to achieve than the diving helmet, however, this was not the case. Trying to keep things symmetrical proved difficult. The cut outs in the cross weakened its structure. I think the weight in combination with my choice of pattern and size added to my problem of stability. I persevered but not a great success. At this stage I feel I should mention how difficult it is to take photographs at various stages. Obviously, this is a messy job and you have to wash your hands between each shot unless you want to ruin your expensive camera. Far better if you can, is to enlist the help of a capable person to take those images whilst you continue your work. Sadly, I live in a village full of incapable people.

   

   

 

Part three: Research: Clay and plaster

Donatello aka Donato di Niccolò di Betto Bardi (c. 1386 – 13 December 1466).

Donatello was born in Florence, Italy. He was a sculptor of the renaissance. Renowned for abandoning the empty iconography of the gothic period and reviving the classical style of sculpture. Breaking new ground, he introduced and demonstrated new philosophies in step with the prevailing trend towards Humanism. It was a movement that was departing from the Omni focus on secular religion. It favoured the exploration of man’s place on earth. His highly emotive work expressed a high level of authenticity and placed him as one of 15th C Italy’s most significant sculptors and patriarch to the renaissance.

Donatello’s work-related heavily to the rebirth of interest in mathematics, sciences and architecture that took place in Florence at that time. Using the figure as his main focal point he became the first to resurrect the nude sculpture, replacing all idolised symbolism that went before. He displayed a mastery of numerous mediums among which were: bronze, stone, stucco, wax, wood and clay. In doing so, he laid down the foundations for the sculptors of the future. Sculptors would now be inspired to seek out new potentials in materiality.

Notable work.

St. John the Evangelist (1408-15) Marble epitomizes the move away from the Gothic style. It demonstrates a more humanised approach in opposition to the legend of the subject. More attention is paid to the saint’s legs to represent the body with naturalism and accuracy. Donatello was by now, demonstrating a unique insight on perspective. He compensated for the fact that audiences would view the work from beneath, thus making the torso inordinately longer than lower limbs.

Auguste Rodin (French 1840-1917)

Rodin is widely known as the father of modern sculpture. He depicted the human form using marble and bronze. His work comprises iconic sculptures such as ‘The Kiss’ (c.1882) and ‘The Thinker’ (1902). After studying decorative arts at an early age, he attempted to enter the prestigious Ecole des Beaux. After being rejected three times, he took up work as a labourer in plaster factories. Later, he travelled to Florence and studied the work of Michelangelo. His drawings have been widely exhibited in recent years, thus elevating his reputation as an accomplished draughtsman. Some have questioned the exploitative nature of these drawings and have caused the eminent artist to be viewed in a less favourable light.

Rodin swept away the prevailing 19th-century attachment to the classical. He now placed more importance on simplicity and poise of human existence. Up to the time of Rodin, this kind of work was little appreciated. It was the antithesis of the academic sculptures so prevalent during this period. His lifelike figures portrayed a fresh attitude toward thought, love and dignified physicality. He had managed to find a way of making the materiality of his work indicate the ephemeral nature of modern man and woman. He discarded the academic style in favour of rough, more crude finishes. This approach to the surface better portrays corporeality, restlessness and action. This style might suggest psychological turmoil; however, it can also recall the perpetual dynamics of modern life.

Willem de Kooning (1904-1997)

De Kooning was born in Rotterdam, Netherlands. At the age of twelve, he served an apprenticeship with a leading design company. With their encouragement, he enrolled at the Rotterdam Academy of Fine Arts and Techniques. The same institution was renamed in his honour in 1998. He stowed away on a ship bound for the US in 1926 and settled in New York. After a brief period as a house painter, he became a commercial artist and immersed himself in the New York art world.

He led the art world of the 1950s. It came to embrace the new movement of American Abstract Expressionism, aka ‘action painting’. In the wake of WW11, he belonged to a group of artists known as the New York School. This group included his wife Elaine de Kooning, Lee Krasner, Jackson Pollock, friend Franz Kline and mentor Arshile Gorky. 1953 saw an exhibition of a series of combative female figurative paintings. The series was known as the ‘women paintings’ and shocked the art world. De Kooning’s move back to figuration split opinion. The women represented icons or types as opposed to portrayals of specific individuals.

Some saw his return to figuration as a sellout and a move away from the principles of Abstract Expressionism which affirmed abstraction. One major benefactor, Clement Greenberg withdrew his support for De Kooning whilst others remained convinced of his relevance. New York’s Museum of Modern Art saw De Kooning’s change of style as a progression in his art. They purchased ‘Woman 1′ (1950-1952) in 1953.

Sir Anish Kapoor CBE RA (1954)

Kapoor was born in Bombay, India. He migrated to London in the 1970s. He attended Hornsey College of Art and took up postgraduate studies at Chelsea School of Art. His reputation expanded during the 1980s. In 1990 he represented the UK at the Venice Biennale with his work ‘Void Field’ (1989) and was rewarded with the Premio Duemila Prize. He went on to achieve the Turner Prize the following year. His use of simple materials coupled with organic and geometric forms, result in the creation of graceful, biomorphic sculptures.

Kapoor started to investigate the subject of ‘The Void’ within considerable stone sculptures. Some had detailed interiors and exteriors with others distinctly defining unoccupied voids. Kapoor’s most high-profile sculptures include ‘Cloud Gate’ and ‘Dirty Corner’. He owns the rights to the blackest paint in production much to the disdain of fellow artist Stuart Semple. Semple has been banned from retailing the paint from his Mayfair art shop. He intends to create an even blacker black and has banished Kapoor from his shop.

Jon Isherwood (1960)

Yorkshire born Isherwood studied both at Leeds and Canterbury colleges of art. He gained a Ba with honours at the latter. He graduated from Syracuse University in New York. He studied sculptural techniques under the guidance of Anthony Caro between 1984-86. He continued his involvement with Caro from 1988-93, partaking as an artist at Caro’s Triangle Artist’s Workshop in New York. Unhappy with the process of casting in concrete and metal, Isherwood began working with stone at the start of the 1990s. He set about examining its interior characteristics along with the spectrum of capacity for exterior forms. He explored the use of various finishes. These included the use of polished, chiselled, smoothed and coloured effects. Much of Isherwood’s work recalls ancient, monumental and totemic structures. Their abiding austere nature endures through the ephemeral age that we currently inhabit. Latterly, Isherwood has combined handcrafted work with computer-aided technology.

Adrian Villar Rojas (1980)

Sculptor Villar Rojas was born in Argentina in 1980. He represented his country at the 2011 Venice Biennale. He works primarily in clay. This choice of medium was initially based on its availability and low cost. Nowadays it’s his preferred way to express his idea of form. He creates sculptures with raw, physical nature. The resulting dried out cracks are reminiscent of relics but the work still retains a modern form. Much of Villar Rojas work mirrors that of land artists Walter de Maria and Robert Smithson. His works are generally demolished post-exhibition. They become a kind of impermanent art form. This idea of impermanence seems to appeal to the sculptor. He uses found material to produce haphazard podiums. Fossils, appliances, fruit and further items are inserted into podiums. Each of the pieces decomposes at varying rates over a time span.

Bibliography

Artnet (n.d.) Anish Kapoor [online] Artnet. Available from: http://www.artnet.com/artists/anish-kapoor/biography [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Artnet (n.d.) Auguste Rodin [online] Artnet. Available from: http://www.artnet.com/artists/auguste-rodin/biography [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Biography.com Editors (2014) Donatello Biography [online] The Biography.com website. Available from: https://www.biography.com/artist/donatello [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Cass Sculpture Foundation (n.d.) Jon Isherwood [online] Cass Sculpture Foundation. Available from: http://www.sculpture.org.uk/artist/jon-isherwood [Accessed 7th September 2019]

Rebecca Lowery (2018) Adrian Villar Rojas [online] MoMa. Available from: https://www.moma.org/artists/42576 [Accessed 7th September 2019]

The Willem de Kooning Foundation (2014) The Artist/ Biography [online] The Willem de Kooning Foundation. Available from: https://www.dekooning.org/the-artist/biography [Accessed 7th September 2019]

 

Rush hour

Rush hour

Today saw me attempt to find and photograph as many sculptures that I could find within an hour. It’s £1.80 an hour to park a vehicle. I’d just been let off for a parking fine a few days earlier. Long and boring story so I shan’t bother to elaborate. I’m in my local town of Hastings, 1066 country. There is not a great deal on show and they’re quite spaced out so I need to get my skates on.

Research re: Sarah Sze and Matthew Day Jackson

Research re: Sarah Sze and Matthew Day Jackson

Sarah Sze: ‘You mark time through objects’

This installation has been in storage for 19 years. It was first shown in Pittsburgh, USA in 1999 and has recently been re-installed at Tate Modern. She merges painting with architecture and likens her sculpture to brush strokes that are thrown across the room. She demonstrates the obsolescence of many of her chosen items that she used in the construction of this sculpture. She views sculpture as a tool used to make sense of time and space. It was interesting to note how the tools used to create the work then become incorporated into the work. Many of the objects in the installation represent different times. There are dated till receipts from 1999 and the present day. Air from a fan, electric lamps and water give the installation a sense of movement and challenges the static nature of sculpture. The objects transcend their surroundings and situation. Sze seems to make use of space that would normally be overlooked. Her work manages to obscure the division between the objects traditional usage and their visual representation.

Matthew Day Jackson. Still Life and the Reclining Nude, Hauser & Wirth London

Day Jackson is attracted to re-thinking traditions in art. He was inspired by walking with his family in the woods. He was interested in how they interacted with the natural environment. It spurred him on to explore much larger themes on how we all interact with nature. In ‘Still Life and the Reclining Nude’ he examines how things from the past reveal themselves in the present. He delves into how forms and tradition persist in modern times. He references Nell Irvin Painter’s ‘History of white people’. He is interested in how western art perpetuates the mythology that beauty relates only to whiteness in terms of race. His ethos appears to surreptitiously overturn the notion of the American dream.  Day Jackson invites us to think of and view ‘Reclining Nude’ as morphing into terra-landscape and discover a conceivable relationship betwixt the two. The sculpture is entirely constructed from natural materials whilst the painting is made using artificial material with the exception of lead. Lead in this case, symbolises death and the transience of time.

Reference list:

Hauser & Wirth London (2018) Matthew Day Jackson. ‘Still Life and the Reclining Nude’ [online video] Youtube. Available from:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFyITcN73N0 [Accessed 07th July 2019]

Tate (2019) Sarah Sze: ‘You mark time through objects’ [online video] Youtube. Available from: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000566129 [Accessed 07th July 2019]

Part two: Project 4: Large drawings from sculptures

Project 4: Large drawings from sculptures.

   

‘Red glass totem’ Large drawing using charcoal and acrylic paint.                               Dimensions: 1.25 metre x 70 cm’s. 

   

  

‘Metbox soliloquy’ Pencil and wax. Size: A2

      

‘Oxidation’ Large drawing using charcoal and water colour. Dimensions: 1.25 metre x 70 cm’s.

‘Oxidation’ Pigment liner and pencil. Size: A2
‘Oxidation’ Pencil. Size: A2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cairn. Pencil and watercolour. Size: A2

‘Incandescent memoriam’ Acrylic paints. Size: A2

‘Incandescent memoriam’ Pencil. Size: A2

‘Toy story’  Marker pen and metallic copper wax. Size: A2

‘Toy story’  Pigment liner and watercolour. Size: A4

‘Toy story’  Pigment liner and metallic copper acrylic. Size: A4

 

Reflection on tutor feedback for assignment 1

Reflection on tutor feedback for assignment 1

I am encouraged by my tutor’s response to my first assignment. I understand the point he raises about drawing the sculptures. I have yet to get to grips with the idea of using drawings as a way of developing ideas. I am sure this will transpire as I progress. I will endeavour to expand my choice of media in the future. I had what I considered great success with some charcoal sketches. Charcoal does have its drawbacks in that it has a habit of transferring black marks on to existing or other work. I need to exercise more care when using this medium. It is clear that I need to store these drawings in individual folders with care. I hope to purchase some oils in the near future. I’d like to experiment with some heavily textured portrayals of my work.

Reading between the lines, it seems it was okay for me to gather materials whilst simultaneously forming an idea for a subject. I had worried and stewed over whether there was some strict sequence to follow or be adhered to. My tutor described my method as a fluid yet driven approach. I will take that as a compliment and use it to build my waning confidence. It is suggested that I research semiotics as it will give me a better understanding on how objects are read as symbols. I touched on this subject in the compulsory part of this course. Never the less, I take his comment on board and will take a fresh look at the subject with a renewed purpose. I further agree with my tutor that whilst attempting to construct sculpture that expresses all the meanings, I have restricted my method of construction.

I think I follow what the tutor is saying about my use of a concrete plinth. It is perhaps surplus to requirements. A bit of a cop out, maybe. It does not relate to the other materials and their intended purpose. I could have exercised a little more creativity. I should have made more use of existing, similar or duplicated materials and been more experimental when trying to achieve stability. I have begun to compile a glossary of terms associated with the subject of sculpture with a view to assisting me with my understanding of context. Having read my tutors report a couple of times, I now feel more positive moving forward.

Glossary of terms

Abstract: Existing in thought rather than a physical existence.

Biomorphic: Often associated with abstraction. A descriptive term used to define form that is organic or irregular, in particular, shapes found within nature.

Concretion: A solid mass

Contrapposto: Counterpoise – descriptive term for human stance. In particular, the majority of its weight placed on one foot with arms twisting off axis from legs and hips.

Corporeal: Having a material form or substance.

Denouement: The final outcome of a sequence of events.

Form: Three dimensional artistic element that encompasses height, width and depth, e.g. sphere, cube, cylinder, pyramid.

Figurative: Metaphorical. Representing forms derived from life.

Gothic Humanism: Non classical ugliness.

Iconoclasm: The action of attacking or assertively rejecting cherished beliefs and institutions or established practices.

Liminal: 1.Relating to a transitional or initial stage of a process. 2. Occupying a position at or on both sides of a boundary or threshold.

Linear sculpture: Three dimensional but made with linear materials e.g. neon tubing or wire -taking up three dimensional space.

Oeuvre: Body of work.

Semiotics: The study of sign process e.g. symbolism, analogy, allegory and metaphor.

Temporal: Worldly as opposed to spiritual.